|
Post by what is hip ? on Nov 7, 2020 20:58:29 GMT -5
how come Hunter didn't carry out his illegitimate children too? .....
Asking for a hooker
Edit... and why would you recycle a speech on the biggest night of your life. Same shit over and over again.
At least State of Unions will only last 20 minutes or so. No longer a complete waste of time. So that is good.
|
|
|
Post by what is hip ? on Nov 7, 2020 21:22:17 GMT -5
Somehow, Biden was able to tweet while delivering his speech:
"We cannot repair the economy, restore our vitality, or relish life’s most precious moments — hugging a grandchild, birthdays, weddings, graduations, all the moments that matter most to us — until we get this virus under control."
Awesome tweet. Then after his speech his whole extending family comes out and they hug each other. Lockdown starts 01/20/2021 at 12:21 pm.
|
|
|
Post by rippy on Nov 7, 2020 22:04:07 GMT -5
What's really stupid is not having a secure way to do this over the internet. Seriously Rippy, you don't think an official US Election web portal would be on EVERY top hacker's #1 list? Toss China, Russia, Iran, N. Korea in on that game as well. Seriously, Machski you don’t think we could build security to mitigate that risk. That’s just silly.
|
|
|
Post by sitzmark on Nov 7, 2020 22:22:54 GMT -5
Joe's Fault. BDS! Too soon??
|
|
|
Post by promontoryrider on Nov 8, 2020 6:40:34 GMT -5
Somehow, Biden was able to tweet while delivering his speech: "We cannot repair the economy, restore our vitality, or relish life’s most precious moments — hugging a grandchild, birthdays, weddings, graduations, all the moments that matter most to us — until we get this virus under control."Awesome tweet. Then after his speech his whole extending family comes out and they hug each other. Lockdown starts 01/20/2021 at 12:21 pm. The Biden Corona Task Force will solve it.....
|
|
|
Post by noturns on Nov 8, 2020 8:46:54 GMT -5
Joe's Fault. BDS! Too soon?? Yea, a little to early. Give it a few weeks
|
|
|
Post by dickc49 on Nov 8, 2020 10:01:05 GMT -5
Joe's Fault. BDS! Too soon?? DDS, and no, not fear of dentistry. Democrat derangement syndrome.
|
|
|
Post by sitzmark on Nov 8, 2020 10:06:10 GMT -5
Joe's Fault. BDS! Too soon?? DDS, and no, not fear of dentistry. Democrat derangement syndrome. Yet to be final, but looking like Joe owns it Jan 20. Could very well be DDS depending on GA runoffs.
|
|
|
Post by dickc49 on Nov 8, 2020 10:30:56 GMT -5
DDS, and no, not fear of dentistry. Democrat derangement syndrome. Yet to be final, but looking like Joe owns it Jan 20. Could very well be DDS depending on GA runoffs. Perhaps yet to be final, but I’m pretty sure I hear the proverbial fat lady warming up.
|
|
|
Post by Machski on Nov 8, 2020 11:22:18 GMT -5
Seriously Rippy, you don't think an official US Election web portal would be on EVERY top hacker's #1 list? Toss China, Russia, Iran, N. Korea in on that game as well. Seriously, Machski you don’t think we could build security to mitigate that risk. That’s just silly. SO lets see, Equifax didn't employ security systems, neither did Garmin or Boyne for that matter. Come on, of course they did. Sure, we can build a big, broad security system for online elections. The difference between that and trading stocks, banking, shopping online is that there are multiple outlets online to do all that, but a US federal election system would likely be a single site. IE, no need to pick and choose, the target will be obvious and singular. Perhaps if the states manage their own election sites, at least the targets will be spread. But in that case, the state's with the largest EC votes would likely become the prime targets. The media has enjoyed playing the foreign Governments meddling in our elections already, I can't imagine what it would be like if we did online voting.
|
|
|
Post by noturns on Nov 8, 2020 14:25:18 GMT -5
Seriously, Machski you don’t think we could build security to mitigate that risk. That’s just silly. SO lets see, Equifax didn't employ security systems, neither did Garmin or Boyne for that matter. Come on, of course they did. Sure, we can build a big, broad security system for online elections. The difference between that and trading stocks, banking, shopping online is that there are multiple outlets online to do all that, but a US federal election system would likely be a single site. IE, no need to pick and choose, the target will be obvious and singular. Perhaps if the states manage their own election sites, at least the targets will be spread. But in that case, the state's with the largest EC votes would likely become the prime targets. The media has enjoyed playing the foreign Governments meddling in our elections already, I can't imagine what it would be like if we did online voting. Absolutely agree Mach. I’m sure Zenny or Barker will correct me, but I believe it was Iraq that recently held elections, in person, one day and indelible ink on one of the digits. Very difficult to steal an election
|
|
|
Post by rippy on Nov 8, 2020 14:52:23 GMT -5
Seriously, Machski you don’t think we could build security to mitigate that risk. That’s just silly. SO lets see, Equifax didn't employ security systems, neither did Garmin or Boyne for that matter. Come on, of course they did. Sure, we can build a big, broad security system for online elections. The difference between that and trading stocks, banking, shopping online is that there are multiple outlets online to do all that, but a US federal election system would likely be a single site. IE, no need to pick and choose, the target will be obvious and singular. Perhaps if the states manage their own election sites, at least the targets will be spread. But in that case, the state's with the largest EC votes would likely become the prime targets. The media has enjoyed playing the foreign Governments meddling in our elections already, I can't imagine what it would be like if we did online voting. Oh shit....this explains it!!! Yep...it would be IMPOSSIBLE to do this!! 🙄🙄🤣🤣🤣 Did you go to kollege with Zenny??🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
Post by Machski on Nov 8, 2020 16:50:46 GMT -5
SO lets see, Equifax didn't employ security systems, neither did Garmin or Boyne for that matter. Come on, of course they did. Sure, we can build a big, broad security system for online elections. The difference between that and trading stocks, banking, shopping online is that there are multiple outlets online to do all that, but a US federal election system would likely be a single site. IE, no need to pick and choose, the target will be obvious and singular. Perhaps if the states manage their own election sites, at least the targets will be spread. But in that case, the state's with the largest EC votes would likely become the prime targets. The media has enjoyed playing the foreign Governments meddling in our elections already, I can't imagine what it would be like if we did online voting. Oh shit....this explains it!!! Yep...it would be IMPOSSIBLE to do this!! 🙄🙄🤣🤣🤣 Did you go to kollege with Zenny??🤣🤣🤣 OK Rippy, sure, we can do internet voting. But to think the US government can create an infaliable defense against hacking it with that amount of input into the system (votes), nope. That would be my 1st guess why we don't have that as yet. My second would be since States control their voting, we cannot get agreement between all 50 to move to a system like that.
|
|
|
Post by what is hip ? on Nov 8, 2020 16:56:25 GMT -5
DDS, and no, not fear of dentistry. Democrat derangement syndrome. Yet to be final, but looking like Joe owns it Jan 20. Could very well be DDS depending on GA runoffs. I'll admit it.. Chuck Schumer inflicts me with DDS. I'll put him on ignore though. I'm not like ZNN with Trump.
|
|
|
Post by MonkeyBrook on Nov 8, 2020 17:49:38 GMT -5
Why we can’t vote on line in 2020 amazes me. Of course we can do this.
And Chuckie and Nancy need to go away.
Let’s go Joe!!
|
|